Flash Player Plug-In Required
Prison Break

Prison Break

Download Episodes of Prison Break

Download episodes of Prison Break, 24, Heroes, Lost and more!

Missed an Episode?

Download Full HDTV Quality Episodes!

Download Episodes of Prison Break

Download episodes of Prison Break, 24, Heroes, Lost and more!


Clarissa's Not Buying What You're Selling, Matt Olmstead

Posted on Thursday May 21 2009 by Clarissa

TV Guide


TVGuide.com: At what point during the four-year run did you decide that Michael would die in the end?

 

Matt Olmstead: At the beginning of this season, we had a debate about it. I was on NYPD Blue and I came on during Season 6, which was Jimmy Smits' last arc - and it was some of the best TV ever. They had the thought that when a character goes that's beloved, if you drop a safe on his head, the audience is going to hate you, because they haven't had a chance to mourn. So let's show up early that the character has a [health] problem. [NYPD Blue creator] David [Milch] did it brilliantly [with Smits' character dying of heart failure], and I always remembered that. So when we met with the writers after the [WGA] strike, we asked ourselves: Is Michael going to last? Either way, let's [give him] a nosebleed in Episode 1. That way we can kind of suggest that something's up, and it also gives us the opportunity to play some scenes - if we want to go down this road - where Sara can mourn it, Lincoln's aware of it, and the audience is aware of it. Then they too have a chance to mourn the loss.


TVGuide.com: What was Wentworth Miller's take on the matter?

 

Olmstead: He ultimately liked it. He had heard rumblings, and when that script went out, a complimentary email came back from him, because he saw the merits of it. The idea of Michael not making it stemmed from a conversation he and I had in Season 2. He said that at this point [Michael's] hands were as dirty as anyone's, and that was something we addressed along the way, this mounting guilt. "I broke my brother out of prison, the ramifications of which have included people getting killed" - neither he the actor nor the character were ignorant or dismissive of that. So the idea of a finale where [in the coda] he doesn't make it but everyone else does was the right ending for him as an actor. For Michael to have traipsed off into the sunset with Sara may have seemed a little like, "Hey, good for you guys."


TVGuide.com: But the network fought you on the death, right?

 

Olmstead: It was split over there; half the people wanted to see Sara and Michael together, and half saw the merit in Michael not making it. Once they saw the scripts, they agreed unilaterally that it was the right move to make.

 

TVGuide.com: It should be noted that Michael is alive in Prison Break: The Final Break (a two-hour standalone movie slated for a July 21 DVD release).

 

Olmstead: Right. The Final Break takes place shortly after everyone's exoneration, so we go back and see Michael alive.


TVGuide.com: That was a nice little wink you had there with Michael Jr. getting a fake tattoo.

 

Olmstead: Yeah, it was [writer/co-executive producer] Nick Santora who had that idea.


TVGuide.com: Let's talk about the returns. Did Paul Adelstein (now on Private Practice) foresee your phone call coming? I have always told him that Kellerman would one day resurface.

 

Olmstead: I've run into him occasionally, and I'd say, "One day you'll get a phone call." He was always enthusiastic about it. We didn't know obviously what the storyline was going to be, but we increasingly wanted to save it for the finale.


TVGuide.com: Rockmund Dunbar [who plays C-Note], I have to imagine, was a bit more surprised.

 

Olmstead: I think so. We knew that this was [the end], and who did we the writers want to see back? Who would make a nice impact in terms of the viewers? We didn't want to just bring him back in a service role; we wanted him to come back for a plot twist.


TVGuide.com: Did you consider bringing back Patricia Wettig's disgraced President Caroline Reynolds?

 

Olmstead: No, no.... That character is done.

 

TVGuide.com: And were none of the various Maricruz actresses available?

 

Olmstead: We thought about it, but all that we really see is probably her holding the child, or saying one line. It just wasn't worth our while - and I doubt the actresses would have been interested either.


TVGuide.com: Robert Knepper told TV Guide Network's Hollywood 411 that the fate you chose for T-Bag was the "greatest" of all the options.

 

Olmstead: I think it wasvery poetic. For us [the coda] was the right combination of people getting just desserts, sweet surprises and tragedy. People were saying that you couldn't have T-Bag still on the loose, that you couldn't do the Hannibal Lecter version of it, because that would put a black mark on Michael. That he unleashed this monster on the world. Nor could you kill T-Bag, because ironically he was too loved by the audience. So we put him back where he started, but with a heartache. He overhears this thing about GATE and it strikes a chord. It reminds him of what he almost had.

 

TVGuide.com: That was an interesting romantic twist you did there with Mahone.

 

Olmstead: That was one of the surprises. Here he is, sending a birthday card to his ex-wife, yet now he's with his former [FBI] colleague [Felicia Lang]. We provide more "what happened" information on that in The Final Break.


TVGuide.com: When last you and I spoke, you said that Michael's overnight tattoo removal was your least-proud moment. Looking back on the show's run, what are you most proud of?

 

Olmstead: The thing I am by far the most proud of is that the [writing] staff was pretty much the same through all four years. There were people who were there from the beginning to the very end - Zack Estrin, Nick Santora, Karyn Usher - and we had other writers who came up through writers' assistants and then got staffed - Seth Hoffman, Kalinda Vazquez, Christian Trokey.... It was a very tight group, and everything was done collectively, because it is such a serialized show. Every outline was tabled as a group, every script was tabled as a group, every cut was watched as a group.... We got to see people evolve and flourish and evolve, and as luxury to me, I had eight people who were all heavy hitters. At the beginning of this season, we were at a crossroads with the network and the studio - it was post-strike, an accelerated process - about what we were going to do. We had to really show them something, and everybody pitched in and we solved it.


TVGuide.com: Is there any ratings number you can hit with the series finale that will get The Final Break broadcast on Fox?

 

Olmstead: I really don't know. I don't even know if they've seen it, being busy preparing for the [May 18] upfronts. But we're really proud of it, and I hope you like it.

 

Entertainment Weekly


Why'd you have to kill him?

 

!MATT OLMSTEAD: It started as a discussion with Wentwoth [Miller] around Season 2. He brought up a good point: His character's hands are as dirty as anyone's. If you look at the initial act that he committed -- robbing a bank to get into prison to break his brother out -- there were ramifications to that; a lot of people got hurt. Not by them, but when they rattled the cage of the company that was after them, the body count started to pile out. And Michael was aware of this. And we've addressed his guilt throughout the show. But at a certain point, it felt nobler to have the character die so that others could live. It just felt a little weird for us to have Michael and Sara holding hands on the beach walking away -- though that would be gratifying in the moment. Knowing that there was pretty much a scorched path behind them in terms of what happened, [having him die] balanced the books for us. He also paid the ultimate sacrifice and, in doing so, everyone else close to him was able to live, including his child.

 

Michael-Sara fans will argue that they deserved a happy ending after watching these two go to hell and back for four seasons. What would you say to them?

 

OLMSTEAD: For me, it is a happy ending. Look at the very first episode of the season when Michael realizes Sara's alive. They have a chance to run away, and they both elect not to because, as two people of conscience, they can't live with what they both now have experienced. And at the end of the finale, when they're on the beach and talking about the baby that's coming, that's a huge victory in that they both stood their ground and, with the help of other people, brought down the ultimate antagonist. So they have their moment.


Can we assume that we'll learn more about the ultimate sacrifice Michael made in the two-hour direct-to-DVD prequel movie [due July 28]?

 

OLMSTEAD: Yes, it dramatizes what happened to Michael. The nose bleed that reared its ugly head at the end of [tonight's finale] was a factor in his ultimate demise in that he knew that he probably didn't have that long to live, but it wasn't the sole factor. It informed certain decisions that lead to his demise.


The two-hour movie picks up right after the finale, right?

 

OLMSTEAD: Yeah, it takes place fairly soon after they're exonerated.


What's the premise?

 

OLMSTEAD: Sara is on the hook for [killing] Michael's mother and she gets locked up while pregnant. The tables are turned... once a doctor in prison now imprisoned, and Michael's on the outside. The majority of the cast is back. It's Michael, Lincoln, Sara, Sucre, T-Bag, Mahone... all the heavy-hitters.


Seeing Paul Adelstein back as Kellerman was a nice surprise. How'd that come about?

 

OLMSTEAD: We reached out to Paul and pitched him the idea of what his character would be doing, and he liked it very much. And then I told him that we would be jumping ahead four years to show where all the characters are, and I asked him where he would want [Kellerman] to be; he was included in the [creative process]. We traded a lot of e-mails and the ideas ran the gamut. We ultimately arrived at what it was, which is he rose to a position of power, but that the widow of his [former] partner that he killed revisits him. In the scene I wrote, she spits on his shoes. [On the day of shooting], I got a call from the director, Kevin Hooks, and he said, "Paul's here, and he [thinks] she would spit in his face." And I said, "Have at it." So she spit in his face. And then he's in the limo afterward and you can see that private moment where [he realizes] he can never outrun his past. That's one of my favorite sequences in the flash-forward. He played the self-loathing and regret beautifully.


Did you encounter any problems getting ABC to loan him to you since he's now on Private Practice?

 

OLMSTEAD: Everybody was very accommodating, and I think it all stems from a universal goodwill towards Paul as a person. He's a really good guy and people wanted to do him a favor. And we were able to get all his scenes done in one day.


Was there anyone you wanted to get back for the finale and couldn't?

 

OLMSTEAD: The only person we couldn't get was Marshall Allman, who played Lincoln's son. We would have loved to have gotten him.


Looking back on the four seasons, anything you would have done differently?

 

OLMSTEAD: I don't have a whole lot of regrets. [Another journalist] wrote that we left it all out on the field by the end of the series, and I feel the same way. Every story was exhausted. Every creative juice wrung out. It was a completely worthwhile experience, and I know the other writers [agree]. It was a difficult show to pull off, and we did it.

 

Clarissa

 

I think I just hate this whole "Michael's hands were as dirty as anyone else's, so it seemed right for him to die for his sins".  Just because Michael was the catalyst for this whole thing (ie. he robbed the bank, ended up in Fox River and initiated the break out) doesn't mean he should have been the one to ultimately suffer for it.  Why not kill Lincoln?  Allow him to make the ultimate sacrifice in exchange for what his brother did.  Or would that have simply negated Michael's initial sacrifice?

 

It just bugs me that Michael was essentially a martyr for the series.  Here's a guy who sacrificed so much and felt guilt for actions beyond his control and then he has to die for them?  Maybe I'm wrong, but ultimately I'd like to think the world is a little bit more fair than that.  Or maybe it's not.  Maybe life really is just a b*itch and then you die.  Bottom line: you can try to justify all you want, Matt Olmstead, but you broke my heart.  And now you're on my list.

 



Add A Comment

Add A Comment




Code in the picture:
Your Name(*):
Comment(*):
 

Comments


I have heard the writers feed us that line often that "Michael's hands were dirty as well..." because of the deaths that occurred due to him breaking his brother out of jail.

It is an excessively stupid point; you just need to push that logic forward and it becomes evident how dumb it is.

Yes, let's say that 10 to 12 people died because he broke his brother out. Well let's see, had he not broken c-note out, he would not have been there to save the people in the Dinner. Had he not brought the company down, how many countless innocent people would have been killed by them to further advance their businesses? 100 at least?... And if that is not enough, how about the fact that if he had not broken Lincoln out, he could not have eventually averted a war between India and China that would have killed millions literally, escalated into a global war no doubt further killing countless innocent lives, and possibly had nuclear fallout consequences given the fact that all the countries involved would have been nuclear countries.

So him breaking his brother out of prison may have cost 10 to 12 lives, maybe even 20; but it saved millions. The balance of what he did is overwhelmingly on the side of having saved countless lives maybe even the world.

Michael could have had one of those moments of doubt and guilt during season 4 and Lincoln or Sara could have easily brought this up and put it in perspective. If anyone deserved to live happily ever after, it would be Michael.

His death was a cop out and a blow to all the loyal viewers.

Also remember that the procedure he had was performed successfully 20 years earlier on his mom. Now, the procedure that is 20 years more advanced, with 20 years more understanding and better equipment is performed on him unsuccessfully?!?

It is a case of the writers ignoring the fact that they should reward the viewers and force feeding us an illogical ending that only satisfies them.

cjn on June 25, 2009, 6:38 am

I can certainly see your point of view and understand it, and it's extremely hard to paint Michael, who is so good natured, with blood on his hands.

However, I've learnt that good intentions don't always lead to good things. To be wholly good, you have to be extremely wise, and think out almost every aspect of what you're about to do.

It's like giving money to a homeless person, the act in itself is one of goodness and kindness, but doing so can lead to events that don't bring about goodness, for example, the homeless person buying drugs, or alcohol, leading him further down the dark hole.

Sure, it's mainly the responsibility of the homeless person for what he does, but some people simply don't have the mental or emotional capacity to look after themselves properly, or do what is right, because of any number of things that happened to them in their life.

Then again, you may very well have the correct point of view, because I believe almost everybody has blood on their hands, at least in the western world, including myself. I'm kind of extreme like that though, and place the weight of the world upon myself.

It was cool, discussing this with you. :)

Kevin Lee on June 12, 2009, 6:50 am

BTW - love discussing this series with you and as this post is getting outdated, if you want to continue, email dwwahl@msn.com anytime.

nw316 on June 10, 2009, 10:50 am

Kevin,

Appreciating our discussion on ethics here.

Westmoreland's death had nothing to do with Michael. He died as a result of the fight with Bellick. He could have gone to the infirmary and had it fixed but chose to stay in the escape to see his daughter. When did Michael have time to see his daughter??? On the run from the FBI & the Company? In Sona? Having a few weeks to pursue Scylla, escape from the Company, battle his mother for his brother? While rescuing Sarah? Priorities wouldn't allow for it. I'm sure if he'd had time, he would have made it to her.

T-Bag never asked but instead stated he was in or else he would squeal. When you risk everything to save an innocent victim (Linc), you don't get blood on your hands because of the collateral damage from others who steal their way into your agenda and commit crimes independently of your will. We are going to have to agree to disagree on this as I sense you believe differently. In your perspective, I don't know how anyone could justify attempting to do anything honorable as inevitably in this world someone always takes advantage and could be connected or spun as a by product of your good deeds. So...

Sammy was intending on taking the escape route for himself and got what he deserved. Yes, Michael set a trap, but had Sammy waited his turn instead of pushing everyone else out, he wouldn't have brought the tunnel down on himself. Michael had to protect his and the Company guy's escape or LJ would have been killed.

I do agree with Michael's guilt in season 1 for not helping the kid who asked him twice for help to get away from T-Bag's abuse and finding no help from anyone later committed suicide. Michael avoided trouble there to protect his plan, and in that scenario deserved to and did feel very remorseful. He redeemed himself some by helping Tweener later, even after Tweener squealed to Bellick about the escape, causing Westmoreland to fight Bellick which is where this post began. - :)

nw316 on June 10, 2009, 10:41 am

Olmstead's comment that T-bag was too loved by the audience to kill him off. That's a joke - sure he was loved but Michael was the main character in the show and was loved by many more millions. And Michael had blood on his hands - Wow - and T-bag didn't !!!!
Mahone had also killed enough people but he got to go free - and Linc probably deserved to die more (although killing him off would have made the whole thing a bit pointless). Totally ridiculous to kill off Michael after everything he did.

p15 on June 10, 2009, 6:11 am

nw316-

I've made a point before that Michael has only ever done something wrong in the pursuit of doing something right. That, however, doesn't make the things he's done right. Nothing is black and white. For every choice, a consequence.

1- Michael persuaded Westmoreland to break out of prison. Sure his daughter being ill was the defining factor for why he broke out, but without Michael, he wouldn't have even tried it. Michael used him in his prison break, he needed his money for the plan. and in the end westmoreland died for it, and not only that, Michael broke his promise. In essence, he swapped Westmoreland's life for Linc's.

2- I think you'll find that T-Bag did ask for their permission to join, and the reason they accepted was so that their plan didn't fall apart. I do think that Michael isn't wholly to blame, but he knew what T-Bag was like, and he still allowed him to escape with them. Again, he swapped the life's of T-Bag's innocent victims for his innocent brother.

3- The chicken foot was thrown down on Bellick! Sammy probably did deserve to die, but again, that doesn't mean that killing bad people is right. In season 3, Michael had learned from his mistakes, he devised a plan so that T-Bag and Lechero couldn't escape, and he also killed Sammy because 1) he didn't want another t-bag on the loose, and 2) because he didn't want the plan scuppered.

Remember? He killed Sammy by dropping the escape roof on his head by removing the bolt that was keeping it together. This is the moment in Prison Break that Wentworth Miller dislikes the most, because he's always seen the character as a boy scout, not a killer.

He's done some wrongs in the pursuit of doing right, and while they're wrongs that I'd also commit (apart from breaking his promise to westmoreland), Michael still has blood on his hands, and righteousness or not, it's still blood.

I hope all that makes my point of view clear. :)

Kevin Lee on June 6, 2009, 11:05 am

I don't get it. They're finally free and at the end they are fugitives again. Didn't Michael couldn't keep at least one promise? It would make more sense that he follows his mother's path and he fake his death to work in scyla in exchange of Sara's freedom. We deserve a better ending. I support the idea of not buying any fox dvd. This SUCKS!

pbexfan on June 4, 2009, 8:30 pm

Sorry Kevin,

Your still shooting blanks...

Westmoreland died from a wound he received from fighting the guard and the coffee pot sliced him bad. He made his own choice to join Michael - Michael did not force him in anyway.

T-Bag never asked Michael for permission to join him. He never asked anyone for permission to kill anyone. If anyone's to blame it is the State because Michael was forced to take him because the State was going to kill an innocent man.

Sammy chose to throw down the chicken foot on Michael and was a bad guy all along, he deserved to die for the crimes he was committing in prison, much less out of it - nothing to do with Michael at all.

nw316 on June 3, 2009, 9:28 pm

nw316-

Sammy, Westmoreland, and T-Bag's victims.

For every action, a consequence.

Hell, Michael made a promise to a dying Westmoreland that he'd go to see his dying daughter and give her money. He never kept his promise.

Kevin Lee on June 2, 2009, 5:47 pm

Michael should not have died. It's such a christian idea that the only way to salvation for one's sins is through death. Salvation can come through life also. This the wrong message and a very sad one. Just because everyone is at peace with his death doesn't make it happy. Sara and Michael gave so much of themselves and should have something to show for that. LIfe can be a bitch and we can't control that - but storylines on TV shows can offer something more positive. I loved PB, but this ruined it for me a little bit. I only hope the producers have kept an ace up their sleeve by not showing Michael dead and maybe he'll be one of the many who has returned from the dead in this show.

Shaulo on June 1, 2009, 10:13 am

I've just watched the Final Break.
I don't deny it's a great ending to an amazing show,PB is the best show ever,but I insist the writers could let Michael live and it would still realistic.
They didn't care about us as loyal fans.
The end could be great with a happy ending 4 Michael.IMO it's soooooooooooo sad ..soooooooooooo tragic & even worse than any movie because we just watch any movie 4 just 2 or 3 hours ,but we have been living with PB almost 4 years.
It was like a fantastic dream & then we woke up suddenly realizing that was just a nightmare.
I don't & I'll never never forgive the writers how they could be so crul with us like this
Most of us r so disappointed about Michael's loss...but any way it's more than a great show

heba on June 1, 2009, 5:36 am

The final end of PB was done beautifully if that is the way you wanted it to go. While watching it I could not help but go back to the beginning when a nieve, almost boyish Michael entered Fox River to free his innocent brother, to the escape, to Sona, to an operation for a brain tumour, to getting shot by his mother and finally to the recuring tumour and a choice between dying of it or electrocuting himself. You took us Mr.Olmstead to a very dark place, it was not necessary, you made a bad choice of not letting Michael survive. You listened to your own theatrical integrity and not to the most important aspect of the whole thing the viewers wishes. The sadness of it is you cannot go back and make things right you did not leave us with a feelgood facor and in this day and age that is what we needed.

Holly,UK. on June 1, 2009, 2:00 am

Then again, any route involved danger and Alex was on his side in the end... which never should have never even been because there was no way Sarah should have been in there to begin with. That said, good action still, and great seeing Gretchen and her redeeming herself a little.

nw316 on May 31, 2009, 3:15 pm

Curious... In "Final Break", had Mahone not turned over Micheal's first plan would the exit route through the Chapel been necessary? If not, then didn't Alex essentially caused Micheal's electrocution?

nw316 on May 31, 2009, 3:08 pm

Kevin,

Can you simply give specifics instead of generalizing your high and mighty allegiance to the producer's reasoning?

It's one thing to suppose you're right because you stand with the creator, it's another to ignore the facts and throw out judgments against anyone who seeks clarification.

Give us one example of the 'blood' on Michael so we all can discuss it, rather than be polarized into superior/inferior generalizations.

nw316 on May 31, 2009, 1:12 pm

I've watched PB seasons 1-3 three times over. Numerous people die because of Michael, and in season 3, Michael, following Sarah's death, kills one of the important characters of that season.

While I agree that it's a poor excuse for his death, Michael does have blood on his hands. Fact.

Kevin Lee on May 31, 2009, 1:03 pm

Father be with them, and give them strength.

Kevin Lee on May 31, 2009, 12:56 pm

Right, producers don't entertain anymore. They just insult you by not doing research, and more concerned to do it with flourish to satisfy the psychopaths. And please, no comparison there with Jimmy Pitt's character. NYPD's genre tends to make it look like real life situations, and we're not too dumb not to consider PB in the realm - in the "kingdom" if you will - of James Bond, Superman, Batman,etc. Scofield just don't have the gadgets of James, the cape of Superman, and the cobwebs of Spiderman. He's just supposed to have a clever brain. So please, Olmstead, erase the cobwebs in your arguments.

I haven't reallly seen all the episodes and was planning to buy all the complete set from seasons 1 to 4, but it's foolish now knowing the lousy ending.

I think the disappointed fans should do a campaign not to buy their DVD's anymore. Anyway, the cast and crew are paid. Let's not make Fox filthy rich. Better, boycott anything Fox from now on.

jo69 on May 31, 2009, 7:51 am

thats right kevin im a fraid scoppy doo may die to of a heart attack or some as the showes are getting so realistic these days, and for OLMASTEAD: even ( tom & gerry) producers couldnt kill gerry as they are smart enough to know that doing that will waste all their efforts so they do what is called open endings that leaves the fans happy and dont kill the series for good even if it is the end u must give us the chance to hope that oneday their may will be another season , so i just cant understan how could u be over smarted by everyone even by cartoon producers & more u made the show more ridiculous than a cartoon

lina on May 30, 2009, 10:56 pm

i really hated the 3 final episods, why in earth do micheal have to buy for everybody else's mistakes?? and yet they are telling us well he robbed a bank to save his brother and for that he should bay ? he did his time prillent writers u cut his toes & left him on the run for 3 seasons , he should be honored , why dont u kill lincon he is a robber, sara she killed 2 people ( kim,christena)in cold blood, hell u didnt even kill tbag for gods sake!!
so, unless fox make it crystal clear that micheal is gonna be back safe and sound in this dvd , we are not gonna bay a beeny to be heart brocken again by them, we r determined to save our micheal, and like it or not writers he is a HERO

lina on May 30, 2009, 10:41 pm

"DON'T WE VIEW SHOWS LIKE PB IN ORDER TO BE ENTERTAINED PRIMARILY.. TO SUSPEND REALITY FOR AWHILE IN ORDER TO BE RELIEVED OF THE HARSH REALITIES OF LIFE."

No, that's not why I watch Supernatural, Dexter, The Wire, and Prison Break.

In future, I suggest you stick to popcorn films.

Kevin Lee on May 28, 2009, 8:09 am

Very disappointing finale. That’s not the way to entertain the fans, after we’ve put up with all the incredulous twists and turns. Isn’t such a show as PB meant to entertain primarily. Producers betrayed the fans..after all the money..
And so many questions: WHY did Michael say Sara and linc are free when they’re fugitives, and Costa Rica (Clarissa is right) has Etradition Treaty with the US, they can be arrested and turned back. WHY did Michael suddenly turned stupid, not knowing how to manipulate the central system, not even bringing, say gloves (gee). WHY no intense sad reaction from Sara and Linc when Michael didn’t come out anymore, and even in the boat.
GRANTING Michael’s tumor was a sure-pass to heaven, didn’t he want to spend a little more time with Sara, and who knows, he might even have lasted until his child was born, by planning more cleverly as he did in the past 4 seasons.
They seemed insulting, hurried up storylines to get some drama to end the series. Redeem yourselves, Producers, by coming up with a spin-off explaining everything. That twist being floated would suit fine.. Michael alive and on a secret mission, helping fine tune Scylla to help the world. She tells Sara before she finally came out of that door. And after, turn it to a light drama (with even comedy), Michael and Sara-completely exonerated- living a simple, ideal, happy married life with MJ and perhaps another kid. Many possible storylines there. Otherwise, you’re the MOST CRUEL TO FANS after we’ve invested emotions.

BTW, it's funny, to put it mildly, to blame Wentworth for Michael's death.. he's only following orders. Omlstead's arguments are all crap, esp, ..T-bag need not die because he's loved by the viewers. HUH!!

And let me add this: DON'T WE VIEW SHOWS LIKE PB IN ORDER TO BE ENTERTAINED PRIMARILY.. TO SUSPEND REALITY FOR AWHILE IN ORDER TO BE RELIEVED OF THE HARSH REALITIES OF LIFE. SO DID WE GET THIS BY PB'S END! I'M A SIMPLE MIND TRYING TO GRAPPLE WITH MY OWN HARSH REALITIES, AND I THOUGHT PB'S END WOULD MAKE ME FEEL BETTER. SADLY, DEFINITELY NO!!

aymee on May 27, 2009, 6:36 pm

Clarissa I could not agree with you more. Matt Olmstead disregarded the feelings of the viewers he knew that Michael dying was a no no but he did not give a damn. He steamed on regardless. Those of us who have seen every episode hoped that after the 21/22 he would redeem himself and pull one of those slick twists but no when brains or perhaps in this case common sense was give out he was last in the queue. He gave us a choice of Michael dying of a brain tumour or electrocuting himself to save Sara. What a choice. If I could have got Matt Olmstead at arms length I would have clipped him round the ear for being so disrespectful and stupid. It was a great adventure but unfortunately Matt Olmstead spoint it by being a fool and giving us a sad ending. In this day a age we could use all the feelgood endings we can get.

A.J.UK on May 27, 2009, 7:05 am

I have so many favourite moments.

- Michael coming to tears when questioning Linc about whether or not he killed the vice presidents brother.

- Michael and linc seeing each other for the first time in prison.

- Michael and Linc finding each other during the riot, and having a big hug, lol.

- Pretty much all the Michael-Sarah moments were amazing in season one, and I was hoping they could of repeated that in season 4 but the relationship never really got interesting again until Sarah had dreams of happily ever after in her sight.

- Michael finding out about Sarah's death, and then the season 3 finale in which michael recalls memories of her. The emotion was so intense.

- I just have so so many. Season 1 was absolutely amazing. It was a freak, but I strongly disagree with those who say that the show went to pot after that. The show just changed.

Season 4 has been the weakest in my opinion, but it was still of a good quality. Episodes 1-15 were good, and there were some corkers in there. The introduction of the mother was hard to stomach, especially so because episodes 16-18 really dropped the ball, but they got it back on track with episode 19 and things ended strongly.

Can't wait to watch the Final Break.

Kevin Lee on May 26, 2009, 1:27 pm

see the final break because it is worth seeing. Definitely a great cast of actors on this show. Thanks to all of them.

Heidi on May 26, 2009, 7:56 am

Point received, Kevin. Maybe we can move on - how about sharing one of your favorite PB moments/episodes.

Did anyone see Final Break yet? I downloaded portions from the rpidshare link but couldn't open them with WinZIP and don't want to buy RAR yet.

nw316 on May 25, 2009, 1:14 pm

Megan:

So is the Titanic bitter? What about The Painted Veil? Or maybe The Fountain?

Amazing films, all ending in death. Yeah, it's tragic and unfair, but sometimes it's poignant, and relevant, and I believe that to be the case with the end of Prison Break.

By the way, I'm not trying to force my views upon, or tell anyone which ending they should have wanted. I'm simply stating from a non personal angle which ending is of greater quality. I'm sorry if I got carried away a few posts back, but I'm tired of seeing verbal assaults on Prison Break and its team.

"MATT is a fucking idiot"

"I HOPE MATT ROTHS IN HELL 4 WHAT HE HAS DONE BY KILLING MICHAEL."

Kevin Lee on May 25, 2009, 11:50 am

Killing Michael was not necessarily wrong in my view, while I agree with comments here the rationale behind it would have gone better untold.
Ultimately, to ensure PB never comes back, Scofield dead assures that. It's a good move a-la Frodo Baggins - diseases do kill - reality. Michael knowing this, sacrificing himself for others understanding his time is short is believable. Artistically, as Micheal's persona became so much larger than life - it's a little of a promotion, rather than going back to 'normal living'.
The problem for me is Olmstead justifying copy catting NYPD by throwing a noose around Michael saying he somehow deserved it smacks of artistic plagiarism and seems to demonstrate both an uncaring detachment with the storyline and arrogant detachment with the fan base involved with PB's week to week, season to season portrayal.

In my view, Michael died from natural causes detached from any guilt over collateral damage from rescuing his innocent brother condemned to die.

nw316 on May 25, 2009, 10:50 am

No it was a tragic ending,I don't see anything is sweet here.
I'm saying it again & again the writers did big mistake & I'm not convinced with their explanation.But it's done we cannot change it now

Heba on May 25, 2009, 12:08 am

I just can't help but feel that the whole journey with Michael was....pointless. I hung tough with him, even through the series' dodgier moments, in the hope that this character would get a happy ending. I feel cheated. I kept the faith and where did that get me? It wasn't a bitter-sweet ending, it was just bitter.

Megan on May 24, 2009, 11:50 pm

Kevin
It's not accepted from the writers 2 ignore the fans of the show because the show belongs to them.They do their job for the fans not for themselves.It's not fair from u to attack most of the fans who r too upset about the final.U shoud accept the others opinions too and don't force urs on us.
BTW no one is attacking Wentworth.He is an actor & he has to accept the writers' decision.
If all of the team see Michael has to die,he would be silly if he doesn't agree.Though he has said before he wants Michael stays alive,but it's clear he had to agree with them.That's why he has signed when he accepted this role 4 years ago.
So I'm angry with the writers,not Went.
Went is my beloved actor even more than Michael who is also my beloved character

Dina on May 24, 2009, 11:30 pm

Hated the ending. Hated Olmestead fake explanations. Never going to watch another show produceedc and writed by these freak people.

Jasmin on May 24, 2009, 9:19 am

Kevin,

Why did you write your last post here? For that matter any of them? Was it not to be read?

PB is for fans. These creatives don't produce so they can sit on a shelf somewhere. They wish to be seen. Which makes them subject to the public both good and bad - it goes with the territory. And they know it and can deal with not pleasing everybody, without silencing their critics.

You're the one who seems to be taking objections to the writer's plots so personally, being defensive against anyone disagreeing with the writers.

If you are going to criticize entertainment fans, that's great. We can accept that. Just at least try to present your points as if you remember the "you" includes you.

nw316 on May 24, 2009, 8:48 am

Thank you for a wonderful Prison Break site, Clarrisa.

Kevin Lee on May 24, 2009, 8:34 am

This has gone beyond the joke.

Let me tell you all something in case you don't know. Prison Break doesn't belong to you. It doesn't belong to me. It belongs to the writers and the creator. They decided to go with Michael's death, and they did so for no one but themselves. Writers and creatives don't participate in whatever it is they do in order to please fans. They do it because outputting their creativity is their very purpose. If people like it, then that's a plus.

The problem with many of you, is that you're being too personal. The moment something falls out of line with your reality, you dislike it. This is no way to analyze the quality of something.

I would of been happy if Michael had lived happily ever after with Sarah. I would of stuck by the show. But the better ending? No, it would not have been for numerous different reasons.

The difference is, most of you are bitterly against Michael's death, and you cannot stand it, if anyone says that it was the right thing to do.

Oh, and I will continue to refer to some as simple minded fools as long as they keep attacking Prison Break's creators, and Wentworth Miller. They don't deserve to be verbally abused just because you don't like the ending that they created.

That's just childish, and selfish.

Kevin Lee on May 24, 2009, 8:27 am

Say Elaine, why don't you just go ahead and tell us how you really feel. (JK)

Thanks, Clarissa, for putting this up for us to rant and rave on.

Another thing bugging me about Kellerman coming back... If he'd turned up missing from the van (i.e. no body() after the hit, wouldn't it have been all over the media,,,"Gov't informant escapes..." and this surely would have filtered back to everyone (the gang, Homeland's Self, etc.), especially since Sarah and Linc's first exoneration would have been adversely affected. Bugs me whenever they take creative free rides to insert a new dramatic scenario like this because a lot of believability flies off the cliff.

Finally, another great moment was when they stashed the burnt uniform in the crooked cops locker after he'd been found with all the roll of dough.

nw316 on May 23, 2009, 7:35 pm

MATT is a fucking idiot after 4 years of sticking wid Prison Break how could he kill Micheal.Knowing dat he & Sara were goin 2 have a happy ending was why i was stuck 2 da show.i dont even want 2 start on how we as fans were robbed on climax of Mike & Sara & how they ended up being pregnant,when & were did it happen,still questions unanswered.Fox should have entrusted da project 2 sum 1 else.We didnt fight so hard 2 bring Sara back 4 this.I HOPE MATT & FOX HAVE LOST THEIR BIGEST FAN & I WILL NEVER WATCH ANOTHER FOX PRODUCTION AGAIN & I HOPE MATT ROTHS IN HELL 4 WHAT HE HAS DONE BY KILLING MICHAEL.

elaine on May 23, 2009, 6:26 pm

To nw316 and heba:
Both of you have pointed out some other great moments. I agree with you nw316 that it is more interesting when people have to come off the fence and choose a side. Not such a safe place to be anymore once you decide to do that(as was demonstrated very clearly in PB). I certainly felt even more empathy for Michael and Linc losing their father, once we were introduced to their mother. I agree with you heba, that was a very emotional scene made even more emotional by a very bad mom. I believe Wentworth's portrayal of pain and loss once he found out Michael lost Sara (or so he thinks), was very well acted. There are so many talented actors on PB. I can't wait to see them in other things. Thanks to the both of you for sharing your thoughts.

Heidi on May 23, 2009, 2:33 pm

That was a great moment, Heidi. A moment that stands out to me is after Sarah began confronting Michael about lying to her regarding why he was in the ventilation system since prisoners weren't allowed to work there, he gave her a very cold look and said something like, "Are we through here?" It was a pivotal moment in their relationship because she thought she knew him, but was now being forced to make up her mind. Not only had he just saved her life, they were going beyond the patient, doctor, good girl, inmate surface stuff, and she was also still in a mix of knowing herself. I love it when people are decide to come down off the fence, choosing sides rather than playing it safe, which is where he was and she needed to go.

nw316 on May 23, 2009, 9:46 am

Yes it was great & Michael lookes so cute as FBI.
IMO the best moments ,S2 ep 22 the final scene between Misa hidding from Panaminian police,it was awesomw & heartbreaking.
The 2nd whem Linc told Michael sarah is dead,it was great acting of Michael,Linc & the music was very emotional.
I also loved the scene when their father died in ep 12 S2.
The father & the brothers for 1st time together then he left them again,it was very emotional

heba on May 23, 2009, 9:35 am

Instead of focusing on the negative aspects of the show and arguing (guilty I know and that's why I stopped), maybe people can comment on their favourite parts of the show. I know there has been top ten moments but there were many great moments on the show that weren't discussed. Personally I loved when Michael showed up at the door of Mahone's house in disguise(season 2) and Pam answered the door. It was a bold move by Michael and brilliant. I loved when Mahone found out that Michael had been at his home and had questioned his wife. Definitelty one of my favourite moments. Mahone was definitely a worthy adversary of Micheal's.

Heidi on May 23, 2009, 9:05 am

For me this show ended on the beach when Michael and Sarah turn to each other and said: "I´m happy right now", "So i´m i".

That's the end of prison break for me. That's how i want this show to end so i will not storm to anyone.

The writters gave me the scene that i wanted to see in the finale: Michael and Sarah together talking about their future. After that there is this button call "stop" that you can press anytime you want, and that's what i did. Those who believe that stand for the people we love and ideals of justice deserves more then a coffin do i did.

Also i'm glad that the final break is apart from the season finale, so people can watch it or not. I will not. As i said it ended for me with those two on the beach.

So that's it. Loved the show. Thank you for 4 great seasons and an almost perfect season finale.

Fuuton on May 23, 2009, 4:06 am

Wow, heated debate. It's nice to see people express their own opinions but maybe it's time to put this to rest. I didn't like the ending, but others did. I can understand their reasons, just like I hope they understand mine. Perhaps once we know exactly HOW Michael died (as I suspect it wasn't solely because of the tumor), then perhaps it might be a better ending.

Anyways, guys, let's just agree to disagree and be done with it.

Go see Terminator Salvation instead. Not the greatest plot (assuming there WAS a plot), but it was a fun action movie where lots of stuff got blown up and it made me fall in love with the mysterious Sam Worthington. Now there's a guy for us to keep our eye on. I have a feeling he's going to be a big star.

~Clarissa

Clarissa on May 22, 2009, 5:51 pm

There's nothing wrong with fans falling in love with shows and their characters and holding various opinions about their fates. There's also nothing wrong with alternate endings in this day and age for mature audiences, i.e.. "I Am Legend".

If you're a fan of fiction, you're entitled to dream completely different scenarios to stories and or their characters. Elsewise what do we do with all the Trekkie clubs?

Bravo to FOX for supporting the PB creators, writers, producers, and excellent cast & crew over the years and giving us all such a wonderful ride. Keeping it going would burn everyone out and that would be wrong. I am glad they realized it and let it conclude.

And... there's nothing wrong with creative spin off series with completely different emphasis based on the same and/or different characters. As long as they keep the positive family values and a little faith in it, I will love watching.

Here's to Michael!

nw316 on May 22, 2009, 5:50 pm

1rst- If you don't like democracies fine, but it doesn't mean the rest of want dictatorships
2nd-if culture is a criteria to be able to write something then writing would be sparse
3rd-you are very good at telling people what they should and shouldn't do, but perhaps you should listen to what they have to say
4th-Mr. Lee is entitled to his opinion, but the way he expressed it is juvenile
5th-arguing over an ending that's already been written pointless and irrelevant

mark on May 22, 2009, 5:34 pm

respect would be a nice change

amanda on May 22, 2009, 5:10 pm

Whether we like it or not,we cannot change it,but imo this ending it's totally unfaire for Michael or for us as fans.We deserved happier ending & I'm really surprised about the writers ,didn't kill Tbag because fans love him!!!Yes I love Tbag but I adore Michael & his character didn't deserve this tragedy.
I'm saying that to all the comments which think that fans who wanted happy ending r just teenagers.
No,it's not true..I'm 38 & I'm a huge fan of PB & Misa and I'm saying it honestly this end is so cruel and tragic.
I think I can judge well as I have very good experience about so many shows and movies.
To those ones who r mad at Went because he agreed about the ending,I'm asking them why?
Went is an actor & he should accept the writers'opinion & he has said b4 in different interviews he doesn't want the character 2 be killed.
But it seemes he had to agree with them.
1 more thing pls try to respect each other's opinion,some of us like the ending & so many don't it's ok.
Fimally we all r PB fans & we will miss our favourite show soon,so pls don't make our final conversations with arguments

sherry on May 22, 2009, 4:56 pm

Hated the ending. Hated the explanation. Enough said.

Kelly on May 22, 2009, 4:41 pm

No read what I have said. A difference of opinion is not a crime. People who don't like the ending are entitled to their opinion.

ann on May 22, 2009, 4:30 pm

alternate ending-it would be interesting to see what others think would be the right ending, but really it's irrelevant in the whole scheme of things because the ending has already been written. Like it or not.

chris on May 22, 2009, 4:25 pm

Ann, so anyone who expresses a different opinion is committing a crime. Is that what you're saying?

nw316 on May 22, 2009, 4:24 pm

I'm for getting on ... say, is there a thread we can go to where we can come up with our own alternate ending, just for fun? Say we start at exonerations. What's the next move:

a. Let Michael live
b. Have Michael die for a noble reason
c. Have T-Bag die
d. T-Bag in prison as someone's else's slave

vote and explain, i.e..

a-1, d-2, c-3, b-4

Having Michael live could be fun showing him adjusting to a much tougher role as the hero dad - working long hours, boring job, watching boring kid shows w/young Mike, Sarah nagging, kid vomiting...

nw316 on May 22, 2009, 4:19 pm

OMG! Some of you are being ridiculous on here. Some people didn't like the ending. Get over it! If you go to the various other sites and check out the comments, the majority of people didn't like the ending. So is that a crime? A lot of people didn't agree with Olmstead's explanation. Again, get over it!

ann on May 22, 2009, 4:10 pm

correction- without name calling and demeaning behaviour

db on May 22, 2009, 3:50 pm

To 123456789 Prison Break:

Heidi's right. Her point was not "that people are going to say what they want to anyways," but that they should be able to do so with name calling and demeaning behaviour. It's called being mature and some people on here not demonstrating maturity. Enough said.

db on May 22, 2009, 3:22 pm

Heidi, you don't need to make the point, because there is no need for it.
Therefore you do not need to bring the argument to such a politicised level. When and if you do, comparing democracies to dictatorships (which are totally irrelevant with the context), I respond to you pointing out that things are not like you describe them to be, and hopefully you know that.
People say what they want to anyways.
Enough now.

Have you even been reading what some are saying? Apparently there is a need say it. There must be certain rules and regulations to this site I would think. I don't think you even understood what I wrote or you wouldn't have responded in that way. As for what I have said, it's my opinion and it is valid as much as yours. I agree with you on one thing, it's enough and I'm done. Good luck to those who are trying to voice a difference of opinion here without ridicule or demeaning behaviour from certain individuals! It shouldn't be allowed. Again that's my point!

Heidi on May 22, 2009, 3:15 pm

Very nice for mr. Olmstead that he and his team are happy with the ending, but I honestly think that if he does a poll with his viewers, he would find out that the vast majority is as much disappointed about the end as I am. It just completely doesn't make sense. But I kind of expected the end to be weak, as the whole series went downhill after season 1 anyway. Especially the transitions between the seasons where in my point of view very weak.

Mister D. on May 22, 2009, 2:51 pm

Heidi, you don't need to make the point, because there is no need for it.

Therefore you do not need to bring the argument to such a politicised level. When and if you do, comparing democracies to dictatorships (which are totally irrelevant with the context), I respond to you pointing out that things are not like you describe them to be, and hopefully you know that.

People say what they want to anyways.

Enough now.

123456789 Prison Break on May 22, 2009, 2:17 pm

btw, if we all didn't love living in fantasies, where would the producers/actors/writers find work???

nw316 on May 22, 2009, 2:09 pm

123456789
Excuse me, I missed something. What exactly has Mr. Lee backed up???
I'm looking and there's nothing there.

We all agree the writer's have the freedom to do as they choose, and I've stated I like the move to end Mike's life.

But at least make it clear; are they trying to do it in a believable manner, for a believable cause or not?

Sacrificial love is at the heart of Prison Break, but the element of believability was the style of the whole first season - crooked cops, etc... If you're going to argue Micheal is guilty of a messing up anybody's life and deserves to pay a price, - where? Prove it.

He accidentally knocked over a store clerk once stealing a GPS... other than that everyone else made their own choices to get involved with him or try to do something immoral like kill the innocent. Why can't you admit they haven't made their case and instead of accusing others of living in fantasy land.
(hey, wait a minute... something tells me you and Mr. Lee have too much in common. C'mon, you can be honest here. Are you living in a fantasy as 123456789!?!?!?)

One more thing...Kellerman wasn't necessary. Any agent from Aldo's company would have done. Kellerman was on his way to death row, and suddenly he has the credibility to grant exonerations backed by a UN attache? I like Paul Adelstein, but that torqued the story line way too much.

nw316 on May 22, 2009, 2:02 pm

For the record, I give the writers and producer credit for leaving the season final open to interpretation. They don't explain how or why Michael died. We see the nose bleed and so we can assume that it's the tumor. Individuals therefore, still have the chance to come up with their own notion or ideas of what might have happened to Michael.
The Final Break will obviously change things, but people don't have to watch it if they don't want to. They can leave it at their on interpretation, if that is what they desire.

Heidi on May 22, 2009, 1:45 pm

To 123456789 Prison Break:

I would just like to see people be able to voice their opinions without unnecessary name calling and demeaning behaviour or profanity. Let people say what they want to. That's my point. No lecture.

Heidi on May 22, 2009, 1:29 pm

O and "jp". Watch your language big time ok?

Before expressing yourself like that (rot in hell), think about its significance first.

Heidi, enough with this praising lecture, about dictatorships unallowing people's opinions. No one is telling you not to express yourselves, you are the ones who are over reacting in the first place.

(Gain culture before writing.
Democracies, now unfortunately, are the masks of the "Masonic lodges" which control societies, by leading them into their wills in the subtlest ways; they are the cancer of the world today.)

Mr. Lee might have been brutal in his manners, but he sure like hell made a point backed up by explanation, unlike all of you others.

123456789 Prison Break on May 22, 2009, 11:47 am

What is this excuse about watching and investing in the show and getting to decide how it should end?
We've all loved it so far beacuse of how realistic it has been. Accept it for how it is.
If you want a happy ending, once more, go and watch some Walt Disney.

This is a show which has portrayed reality, throughout the whole of its existance.

Micheal died, because he had a brain tumor, and yes the operation did not work out for him.
It happens very often in life, where certain cures are not enough for these horrible deseases.

What would have seemed less realistic would have been Michael's hypothetical survival, due to a mysterious operation carried out by phantomatic doctors.

Olmstead gave a simple explanation, Michael chose to SAVE Linc's life and sacrifice ANYTHING else in exchange for it, because of what he did for him (that was the spirit of the show, not Michael's and Sara's happy ending). He got many other lives ruined in the process.
He eventually died of brain tumor, portraying perfectly how unfair, ironic and sometimes even adeguate life is towards most of us, in many situations.

Clarissa, you say, why not kill Lincon? That move would have ridiculised the whole show, as the sole purpose of it was avoiding that guy's death in the first place.

Then you guys can keep criticising how much you want, but you surely aren't being objective.

123456789 Prison Break on May 22, 2009, 11:25 am

Well said Clarissa! I'm tired of certain individuals trying to force their OPINIONS on others. People are entitled to express their opinions, even if it is different from others. Many of us live in a democracy, not a dictatorship and we can say what we want to. THANK YOU VERY MUCH!

Heidi on May 22, 2009, 11:20 am

Mr. Lee,

Simple minded fool here- you remind me of the guy who asked his neighbor if he could borrow his axe.
The neighbor replied, "No you can't borrow my axe. I have to make soup."
"Well, what does making soup have to do with me borrowing your axe?"
"Nothing. But if I don't want to loan you my axe, one excuse is as good as another."

All I'm axing is are the producers interested in logically planning their plots so us simpletons may quit trying to make sense of them.

They obviously make perfect horse sense to you.

nw316 on May 22, 2009, 10:27 am

Kevin Lee can rot in hell

jp on May 22, 2009, 8:55 am

someone should explain to mr.Olmstead what the word 'Happy' means. And what the crap is he talking about Michael's dirty hands. T-bag or mahone, i think their hands are dirtier. Why not kill one of them. The fan loves T-bag and that's why they let him live??? Are you saying Michael's the least favourite character on the show that you just had to kill him??? YEAH RIGHT.. nice job Mr.Olmstead & Mr.Miller, you guys must be very proud of youself right now. This is so stupid.

ann on May 22, 2009, 8:50 am

I wonder if Mr. Kevin Lee below would consider watching my sister recover from a car accident so horrific that she couldn't walk for 2 months and helping nurse her back to health for nearly a year (after 7 subsequent surgeries), or watching my cousin and my friend go through breast cancer means I've "seen real pain". In all of those instances I saw the real power of the human spirit: the desire to live.

I'm afraid that Mr. Lee is the one who's taking things too seriously. I'm merely deconstructing an argument. I GET that it's a TV show. I understand it's not real characters. I'm just saying that Matt Olmstead put forward an argument and I'm trying to counter it. I see that's what those of you below did as well. I'm prepared to defend my readers, Mr. Lee, so you can criticize all you want, but I'm not going to silence people's comments, insult them or think them wrong.

~Clarissa

Clarissa on May 22, 2009, 8:46 am

My word, people are still going on about this. I can't believe what you many simple minded fools think about the death.

It was the right thing to do. Wentworth Miller knew it was the right thing to do. The Prison Break writers knew it was the right thing to do.

It was the right thing to do!

You lot are so obsessed with happy meal retarded bullshit, that you just can't get over the fact that someone has died. You're ridiculous, and the people who have been taking shots at Wentworth Miller for the death are even more ridiculous.

This was never a romance show about a boy and a girl. It was about a boy scout.

Ask anyone who's suffered from a brain tumour, and other forms of Cancer whether they thought it was the right thing to do, and the result would be unanimous in favour of it.

You lot need to grow up. Maybe when you've actually gone through some real pain in life you'll understand.

Kevin Lee on May 22, 2009, 7:59 am

I don't know what to say about the ending. I have been going over it in my head and I still don't know. I do agree that all the characters' hands are dirty as a result of what The Company put into motion. So it's hard to say that some of them shouldn't have died as well or instead of. I do know however from being on other sites that Wentworth Miller has taken some serious bad hits for supporting the death of Michael. A lot of people are not happy with him right now. I think that is why he declined many interviews. He's just an actor though. He's not the creator or producer.

Heidi on May 22, 2009, 6:10 am

You have got to be kidding me!
All those seasons... all those episodes that have left me white-knuckled at the end, waiting to see what frustrating on-the-edge-of-your-seat ending the creators have come up with for each ep..... WAITING for a happy ending in the long run.....
...... AND HE DIES?!?!?!?!???!?!?!?!

AAARRRRRRGGHGHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Here I was, watching all the loose ends get tied up and feeling for the FIRST TIME EVER that the damn show was finally giving the characters the ending they deserved. Nodding at what eventually happens to each of them, and the last scene, a GRAVE STONE?! WHAT! You've gotta be kidding!

I'm not angry. Just exasperated.

I loved the show, and kept watching to see if the characters got their happy ending.

Every one of those characters had 'blood on their hands' - it wasn't particularly fair that Michael ended up dying for it.

But I guess if so many people are into the show then you've achieved what you set out to. :)

Damn you!

lgilroy@optusnet.com.au on May 22, 2009, 5:13 am

A bit of stupidity if you ask me:(Olmstead's comment to TV Guide) "Nor could you kill T-Bag, because ironically he was too loved by the audience." So then Michael who is Michael to the audience... he saves everyone vs T- Bag's evil killing and so he needs to die because what - the audience cares less for Michael than T Bag???

nw316 on May 22, 2009, 4:31 am

I totally agree with u Clarrisa,I'm not conviced at all about Mr Olmstead's point...Michael doesn't deserve happiness because he has blood on his hands & he caused pain 4 many people!!!
It seemes the writers forgot that Michael never was serious about the bank robbery & it all was staged to go to Fox River & free Linc after he failed to free him by legal ways.
They forgot that he only killed Sammy in S3 as self_defence,he never meant to include Tbag or any of the other bad guys in his escape,he was just forced to escape with them.
He never has more blood than Alex,Paul or even Linc.They all have more blood on their hands way way from Michael & we saw all of them got their happy ending!!
That seemes to me is not fair at all 4 Michael..he deserved some peace with Sarah & his son after all what he has been throuh ,he was never happy in his life .Everyone abandoned him in his life & when he finally found happiness,he didn't even see his son & lived with Sarah even just a little time!!
Where's the justice here mr Olmstead?What happy ending u r talking about? R u kidding Us?
I'm sure they could do better ending if they wanted & it would still realistic.Reallty is not necessary to be sad.If the writers just cared about loyal fans & how we would feel disappointed about Michael's tragic ending.
Finally it's their decision,but we deserved happy ending after we watched bad circumstances happen to the brothers almost every episode during the 4 seasons.
I just want to tell him it's my first time I'm not anxious at all to watch the next episode which never happens 2 me during watching the 79 episode of PB.

heba on May 22, 2009, 2:50 am

I also don't follow the whole Sara is on the hook for killing Christina. Nice they came up with a plot to have them rescue her, and I'd already guessed Michael would die getting her out, based on knowing his time was short, but how on earth could she be guilty for Cristina's death??? In other words, Micheal's, Linc's, Mahone's, Kellerman's words mean nothing following exoneration, despite having saved the world from WW III and giving the device to feed the world through solar energy to the UN? After all this, their testimony means nothing as to what Christina was about to do - kill her own son, and spin the world into chaos??? Sounds a bit cheesy to nab her for this.
BTW is their a mention of Gretchen in Final Break? A little loose end there.

nw316 on May 21, 2009, 6:19 pm

I totally agree with you Clarissa about the reason for Micheal's erasure in the script. But I do agree with the move - just not the reason. I heard them speaking to the issue of Micheal's guilt in Season 3 - him landing in Sona and dealing with it - but you're right, Clarissa! Michael was never to blame for any of those deaths. It was the company, Cristina's company, the Chinese agents, or bad cops that chose to exact all that evil, not Mike. Even T Bag's evils should be placed at the feet of T Bag, not Michael.
That said, it's great having a hero go out on top, and that's what's happening here. You notice the awkwardness of the conversations between him and Sarah regarding normal life? Heck, neither one of them knew anything about raising a family, and also did Sarah love him for who he was or the thrill of the over comer and sacrificer he became. Could she (they) be happy with each other after the thrill ride? Remember her comment to Michael in Season 1, something like, "Is it all just a high?" He knew it wasn't - but did she?
It may have been much harder for them once all the action and drama was over.

nw316 on May 21, 2009, 6:09 pm

Download Episodes of Prison Break

Download episodes of Prison Break, 24, Heroes, Lost and more!

Missed an Episode?

Download Full HDTV Quality Episodes!

Download Episodes of Prison Break

Download episodes of Prison Break, 24, Heroes, Lost and more!